PFBC 2010 Biologist Report - Laurel Hill Creek & Big Sandy Creek Basins

Laurel Hill Creek & Big Sandy Creek Basins

Search for Wild Trout

Somerset and Fayette Counties

June and July 2009

Fisheries Management personnel from the Area 8 office in Somerset with assistance from interns from the 3 Rivers Ecological Research Center and biologists from the Somerset County Conservation District, surveyed 15 unassessed waters in the Laurel Hill Creek and Big Sandy Creek basins in Somerset and Fayette Counties. The surveys were conducted as part of a concentrated statewide effort to document wild trout waters throughout the Commonwealth that had not been previously surveyed. Using GIS technologies, streams with the potential to hold wild trout and that were also facing pressure from human influences were identified as candidates to sample. Sampling was conducted using backpack electrofishing gear during June and July 2009. Table 1 below lists the streams sampled and whether or not wild trout were determined to be present in the streams.

Table 1. Unassessed streams in the Big Sandy and Laurel Hill Creek basins surveyed during the summer of 2009.

Basin	Stream Name	Latitude/Longitude of Mouth	Wild Trout Documented
Big Sandy Creek	Stony Fork	39 45 58 / 79 37 28	No
Big Sandy Creek	Scotts Run	39 47 44 / 79 37 02	No
Big Sandy Creek	McIntire Run	39 47 30 / 79 37 06	Yes
Big Sandy Creek	Patterson Run	39 43 15 / 79 44 52	Yes
Big Sandy Creek	UNT to Little Sandy Creek	39 44 22 / 79 35 31	No
Big Sandy Creek	UNT to Little Sandy Creek	39 45 02 / 79 34 30	No
Laurel Hill Creek	Mose King Run	39 54 17 / 79 18 58	No
Laurel Hill Creek	Gross Run	40 01 45 / 79 13 21	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Crab Run	39 59 07 / 79 15 36	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Spruce Run	39 59 16 / 79 14 31	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Whipkey Run	39 54 41 / 79 18 21	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Paddytown Hollow	39 50 40 / 79 18 47	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Smith Hollow	39 51 22 / 79 19 11	Yes
Laurel Hill Creek	Crise Run	40 01 43 / 79 13 21	No
Laurel Hill Creek	UNT to Cranberry Glade Run	39 54 03 / 79 22 06	No

Out of the 15 streams surveyed, eight streams were documented as having wild trout. Many of the streams surveyed do not support fishable wild trout populations, but possess water quality and habitat suitable for wild trout. Also, many are located on private property and landowner permission must be acquired before angling is considered.

As the GIS methodology used to identify unassessed waters focused on encroachment by humans in a watershed, biologists made note of all stressors present in the streams that were sampled. As evidenced in the pictures below, sediment from runoff is just one of the major forms of pollutants that can severely impact a wild trout population. The brook trout pictured below is one of just a handful of fish captured in a stream with a severe sediment problem. Sediment can cover trout spawning redds and prevent trout reproduction from occurring, with negative effects on the wild trout population.

Sampling a pool on a Laurel Hill Creek tributary

Native brook trout from a Laurel Hill Creek tributary. Heavy siltation from runoff has stained the water and reduced the wild trout population, despite what appears to be ideal habitat. Interestingly, the stained water also reduces the natural coloration of the wild brook trout.

– Prepared by Area 8 Fisheries Biologist Mike Depew

Biologist Reports -- PFBC Home

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Web Privacy and Security Policies